In order to improve our
countries economy government tries to introduce foreign investment in India.
Let we see in what way This foreign investment will help to improve our economy or not.
First of all our
country is based on agricultural economy. That is why the government mainly
says fdi in retail will give benefit to farmers. It will eliminate
intermediaries. Give more employment opportunities, etc etc.
Why we need foreign
investments?
We are not having
sufficient fund to manage our country. Let us see how our country earning
money.
In economy balance of
payment is divided into two
1. Current
account
2. Capital
account
This current account
gives us short term term earnings whereas capital account gives long term.
Again we can classify
this current account into
1. Visible
(goods and commodities we produced, exported, imported)
2. Invisible
(services, transfer, income)
This visible current
account can be divided into
1. Exports
2. Imports
The sum of export and
import is called as our countries balance of trade. Just like our family
income and expenditureJJJ.
under invisible current
account category transfer is important source of income. Remittance sent by
our citizens who are working in abroad generate a considerable income to our
country.
Here let we talk about
second part of balance of payment that
is capital account. This capital account is long term investment. Under this
we have
1. Foreign
direct investment
2.
Port folio investment
3.
NRI deposits
4.
Short term capitals
5.
ECBS
For the year 2012 we set
target $360bn, but as per recent announcement we are not achieving that
target in this fiscal year.
When we need foreign
investment only when we affected with trade deficit.
Ok let we see what is
trade deficit
When import>export
it is called trade deficit
Whereas
Export>import is
called trade surplus. We are consuming more that is we are importing more
than exporting. That is why we are having $175bn trade deficit.
In the year 1991-1992
we had balance of payment crisis. That is why borrowed loan from
international monetary fund.
Now we come to foreign
direct investment
This FDI is divided
into two
1. Greenfield
FDI
2. Brown
field FDI
If we
see these types greenfield FDI is for construction purpose whereas brownfield
FDI is for consumption purpose.
The
present proposal of FDI is only for brownfield FDI it is not good for us.
Because greenfield fdi gives opportunities from the bottom level whereas the
brownfield fdi gives development on the well established existing
institutions which means it borrows the shares of the established companies
and it will do some jimicsJ
The
investment also divided into two
1. Domestic
direct investment
2. Foreign
direct investment
Domestic direct
investments means the assets we have it may be liquid assets. All our
citizens having gold as a saving this can be used us.when we have this
surplus domestic investment no need for foreign investents.
Even if we receive
foreign investments only direct investments alone will give some sort of
benefits that institutional investments, because this institutional
investments, nri deposits etc will investment only when our country gives
them more interest rate otherwise they won’t invest on those shares.
Under present situation
the foreign directinvestments are used in consumption purpose. Do you know
when the foreign directt investments will give us benefit only when they were
used in construction purpose then only we can get benefit. Present FDI is not
used in construction purpose.
Secondly we are using
it in oil imports, and
Gold imports, we have
imported 1000 tons of goldJ
Ofcourse oil import is
import because using oil only we are generating powers. If we use it in this
two matters alone will we get any
benefit ?
Now let we see about
FOREX
Forex is divided into
two
1. Asset
2. Liabilities
Assets and liabilities
together called as repatriability
Under asset forex we
have 1. Export earnings, 2. Foreign aid(oc la vara dubbu) JJ.
This foreign aid neet not be repaid by us.
Under liability forex
we have 1. FDI consumption 2. FIIs 3. NRI external accounts 4. Foreign
Currency Non Resident Accounts
POSITIVE ASPECTS OF FDI
ACCORDING TO OUR COUNTRY
1. Infrastructure
development
2. Warehouse
3. Power
4. Roads
5. Elimination
of middleman
6. Jobs
7. Technology
8. Remunerative
price
9. Managerial
capability and operatioinal probability
10.
Inflation will be
controlled
As per FDI retail policy what will we get?
1.
$100mn minimum we will
get
2.
50% invested in
infrastructure
3.
30% outsourcing to be
outsourced from the local markets i.e through SMEs
COUNTER TO THE POSITIVE ASPECTS
OF GOVERNMENT VIEW ON FDI
1. Elimination
of intermediaries
According to the present market situation we have
1 or more intermediaries. When FDI is coming to our country they will be
eliminated. Indirectly they say lobbying giants of US will act as
intermediaries which will hidden from our eyes. They are walmart, tesco,
sainsbury, carrefloor
2.
Cold chain and Warehouse
Why our government waiting for someone to come and
to it. He also will buy everything from india or where it is cheaply
available.(i.e from china more cheap than our market) so benefit will go to
the giants and other countries not for us.
As per Rao manmohan model FDI should be banned in
india but the government did not considered the recommendations of this panel
3.
Predatory pricing will
be controled by our competition commission of india but in reality the CCI
can’t do anything in this matter because it can impose only penalty. That
penal amount is very meagre compare to what they earned. For example essar
company earned more in 2G when we questioned it russia threatening us we will
go to ICJ ADR etc,same thing will happen.
4.
Infrastructure
If we talk about power and roads it is completely
under our government control.if anything done in this respect it should be
done by our country not by those giants. Government hide this truth from us.
5.
Technology, mangerial
and operational process
Already we saw this FDI going to be invested in
consumption purpose only meagre amount will be invested in infrasture. Even
if they invest in infrasture the benefit will be enjoyed by the reality
sector not by our agricultural sector. Already the reality sector earning
much more if they earn through FDI they become much more wealthier people of
our country not our agricultural community.
6.
Jobs:- if we talk about
employment we have two sectors
1.
Agricultural
2.
Manufacturing
Present GDP
contribution in agricultural sector is only 16-17%. Our country is suffering
from under employment, at this juncture this proposal will not work. Second
thing our government introduced krishi vikash yojana but its target of 4% was
not yet achiveed so far.
Manufacturing
contributes 14-15% to the GDP
Target=25%
This target was
mentioned in National manufacturing policy
Our country shows China
as role model for introducing FDI in retail. Just think their economy is
manufacturing sector based but our’s is service sector based economy. Service
sector’s contribution in GDP is 50-60%. Will this fdi help us?
India has the highest
density population=11/1000
95% belongs to BPL
families. These BPL people running small shops and earning for their life. If
the FDI is introduced these shops will be entirely abolished. This FDI will
give opportunities only to the younger generation the older generation will
be left unemployed.
AS PER US STUDY
Walmart’s turn over is
$450bn
2bn employment
opportunity
Our tirana’s turnover
is$460bn
44mn employment
opportunity
REMUNERATIVE PRICING
US STUDY
Every 20 minutes one
farmer quitting agriculture. If this walmart provide good opportunities why
they are doing so?
Not only that US
provides more subsidy to their
farmers. Walmart has no role in their benefits. If this walmart introduced in
india our country people should beg before the another country for their
daily bread.
INFLATION
This fdi will not
control our inflation in any manner. It will introduce dictatory pricing and
predatory pricing
MIDDLE MAN
This walmart will
introduce standardisation, quality control and certification.
INDIAN STUDY
Our country introduced
cooperatives. We are the largest producer of milk in the world.70% were given
to the farmers as remunerative pricing in india at present and 30% to the
retailer. If FDI introduced this ratio will change 30 to farmers,70 to
retailers/
OUTSOURCING
Our country introduced
dereservation policy in SMEs earlier 374 items produced by our SMEs now only
24 items produced by SMEs. They were not in a position to fulfil the
requirements of those giant companies.
WTO agreement:-
As per Trade related
investment measures(TRIMs) we introduced national treatment policy i.e.
foreign players and national players must be treated equally.
Finally our state
government said we will not introduce this FDI in tamilnadu. Can they stop
introduction of FDI in tamilnadu?
As per 7th
schedule of our constitution, foreign investment , foreign policy are under
the control of union list but retail is under state list. State government
can’t do anything in union decision. We have signed bilateral investment
protection agreement(BIPA) with 84 countries using that russian president
vladimir putin threatening us.
This BIPA has two draw
backs
1. National
treatment(according to this we should treat foreign players equally with our
players. Our people already in bad condition can they compete with them?)
2. Most
favoured nation status(this is to establish normal trade relations between
two nations. But it will benefit the hidden middlemans walmart, testco,
carrefloor)
INDIAN STUDY
Parliamentary standing
committee chaired by Mr. Murlimanohar Joshi analysed four aspects
1. Jobs
2.
Predatory pricing
3.
Dictatory pricing
4. Environmental
issues.
Then
they recommended complete blanket ban on FDI in india.
ICRIER
STUDY
In this study only 300 people from high
class and middle class people were surveyed but main target people below
poverty level families didn’t surveyed.
LOBBYING:-
In us lobbying is not
an offence infact they have to produce a report once in 3months under the
lobbying disclosure act.
Implicit lobbies of
india are 1. ASSOCHAM 2.CII 3. FICCI
FEMA:-
Our RBI recommended to
introduce amendment in FEMA when a person filed a writ against FDI. But our
supreme court said it is executive policy we can’t intervene in this matter.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE:-
There is a threat that
these companies many compel our farmers to produce same crops for number of
time and use of pesticides in our soil. This will affect soil fertility. The
farmers can’t produce as per their wish.
|
|
Friday, 28 December 2012
FDI in retail
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment